![]() Its inventor, Willard Libby, eventually won a Nobel Prize for his discovery. Used on organic matter, the technique measures the amount of radioactive carbon decay to determine an object’s age. Perhaps the most famous absolute dating technique, radiocarbon dating was developed during the 1940s and relies on chemistry to determine the ages of objects. For a more precise date, archaeologists turn to a growing arsenal of absolute dating techniques. Its techniques are often subjective, and an artifact’s location within a site or relative to other objects may not reflect its actual chronological age, as things may have gotten shifted around at some point in time. Objects can be grouped based on style or frequency to help determine a chronological sequence. Seriation, in which groups of artifacts from the same site are statistically analyzed and put into chronological order, can also point to a site’s age. ( Learn how archaeologists dated the earliest metal body part in Europe.) Then, they use contextual clues and absolute dating techniques to help point to the age of the artifacts found in each layer. Archaeologists use that assumption, called the law of superposition, to help determine a relative chronology for the site itself. Like a layer cake or slice of lasagna, a site’s lower layers are assumed to be older than those that lie above them. In stratigraphy, archaeologists assume that sites undergo stratification over time, leaving older layers beneath newer ones. Relative techniques were developed earlier in the history of archaeology as a profession and are considered less trustworthy than absolute ones. ![]() Photograph by James King-Holmes, Alamy Relative dating The AMS will measure the relative proportions of carbon isotopes to determine the objects age. Small tubes containing CO2 derived from artifacts are placed in an accelerator mass spectrometer (AMS).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |